|
Overview of The Material Nature of the Universe
I believe the universe is infinite.
It is composed of particles, which are composed of clusters of
smaller and smaller particles, which decrease in mass on into infinity.
Matter is also composed of larger and larger clusters of particles,
which
increase in mass on into infinity.
Support for this common sense extrapolation is easily demonstrated by very simple observations of the known universe.
At any level of observation,
there are, in general, always greater and
greater masses surrounded by greater and greater distances between
these masses. Likewise, on a molecular level, the same observation
reveals that the opposite is true. There are, in general, smaller and
smaller masses, surrounded by smaller and smaller distances between
these masses. Just because mass becomes so small, that it cannot be
detected, does not mean it ceases to exist, or, that it changes into
something completely different. I Believe the Spirit of God gives motion to the material universe. Science cannot prove whether God exists or not, so scientifically, my statement about God and motion cannot be proven to be true or false. However, once things are in motion, I believe we can forget about arguing whether God did it or not. Let's focus on what happens after everything is put into motion. That, in itself, is something man has been trying to understand for a long time. To understand the basic principles, of how things work, I believe we need to let go of many of the dearly held concepts taught to us for most of the twentieth century. I believe there is no way of proving, that matter turns into energy. What if, what we think of as energy, is really just a different form of matter, which is made up of particles too small to detect or measure? Follow me down this road, with this thought in mind, and let's see where it leads.
Particles are composed of smaller particles, which become so small that they become unrecognizable as matter. They may appear as something else, such as light, or gamma rays, and maybe even anti matter. Yet these extremely small undetectable particles can exert a profound influence on the cosmos. I believe they may answer questions concerning theories such as weak force, dark mater, anti matter and gravity.
I believe matter, set in motion, by the word of God, interacts with itself, by following one of three rules. 1. A particle or body in motion collides with another particle or body of matter, of a certain range of mass to itself. 2. A particle or body in motion continues in one direction, with a trajectory influenced, perhaps, by the entire mass of the finite universe, seeking a path of least resistance. 3. A particle or body in motion enters into an orbit, with other particles or bodies, of a certain range in mass to itself, and of a certain range in trajectory and velocity to itself.
Motion is stored in matter, by orbital states. It is released, when a body in space, is bombarded by a sufficient number of other masses in space, to initiate a self sustaining chain reaction, of colliding particles, which disrupts the orbital states of matter. Some of these very tiny particles are hurled out of their peaceful orbital states and into the space outside the larger mass in which they reside, where their motion has been passively controlled by orbits. when this is done on a observable scale, it is generally referred to, as some type of energy release.
I believe the key to understanding how gravity works is to first understand how matter interacts with itself. Matter, within a certain mass range and within a certain distance of another body of matter in space, is attracted by a vague term we call gravity. I believe this can be better explained, by applying the third rule of matter interaction, which is the tendency of matter to enter into orbits. Here is how I believe this works, to create what we call gravity. An infinite number of smaller and smaller particles, which are much smaller in mass, than electrons, escape a body in space and travel outward through the relative void of space, obeying one of the three rules I mentioned. When orbital opportunities are found, by some of these particles, as they enter into the mass of another body in space, matter is compacted, which creates the relative void, necessary to cause more particles to be drawn toward this body in space. These very small masses escape the body, in which they reside, at a rate which decreases, as the mass of a body in space increases. As these very small undetectable particles enter into and travel through a larger mass in space, they do one of three things. They either miss other particles associated with the larger mass, or they collide, or they enter into orbits around other very small sub atomic particles associated with the larger body. A relatively greater void is created by a larger mass, since the larger mass has more opportunities for orbital states and at the same time, not as many of these tiny particles are emitted at the same rate, from a larger mass. This causes the smaller mass to fall toward the larger mass. If the relative velocities and trajectories of the 2 bodies are within the proper range, than the smaller mass will enter into an orbit around the larger. This interaction between two bodies in space happens on an infinitely smaller and smaller scale, where the gain or loss of mass to either body is too small to be measured. The orbiting phenomenon of particles allows matter to compact more efficiently in less space. However, there are less orbiting occurrences, for these undetectable sub atomic particles, than collision occurrences, as they are absorbed into the larger mass, until the larger mass obtains the density of a black hole. Never the less, there are still enough orbiting opportunities to continually create a relative void, causing the smaller mass to continually fall toward the larger mass in an orbit around the larger mass. As I have said before, this happens on an infinite scale. Alignment of the molecules and atoms in a detectable mass can amplify this effect, such as that seen in a steel magnet, but the principle is the same, for planets and stars, as well as for that of electromagnetism and nuclear bounding in the nucleus of atoms.
This phenomenon creates a relatively weak force in matter, when dealing with masses the size of planets and stars. At these sizes, there are many more opportunities for collisions, than for orbiting. There are an overwhelming number of collisions in stars, relative to orbital states. These collisions are what eventually activate self sustaining nuclear chain reactions in bodies compressed by gravity to the mass of stars. Orbital states hold the star together, but the overwhelming number of collisions happening at the same time, creates enough havoc through more and more collisions, to create a self sustaining nuclear reaction, where very small particles are hurled back into space, in different forms of radiation. (I do not have the mathematical skills to prove or disprove what I am saying here, but perhaps some one out there does)
Black holes are good examples of bodies, massive enough, to provide many more orbiting events, relative to collision events. They provide such a large number of orbital opportunities, relative to collisions, that the void created between a black hole, and any object coming into its event horizon, is strong enough, to suck apart recognizable elements entering the event horizon, and break apart the orbital states holding together the nuclear bound of protons and neutrons. Outside the event horizon, matter is drawn by the law of orbits toward the relative void created by a black hole, compressing matter into a smaller and smaller space, by the relative weak force we call gravity. Orbiting opportunities are not found in the quantity of those located in the interior of a black hole. Collisions happen much more predominately, creating the observable phenomena of stars and galaxies. Particle collisions in stars provide enough force in their collisions to allow the smashed particles to escape in the form of heat, light, x rays, gamma rays, etc. Star creations are good examples of matter being drawn into itself by the force created by the law of orbits, into a mass that is large enough to promote a nuclear reaction, by the law of collisions, but not massive enough to quench nuclear reactions, by providing the necessary number of orbital opportunities. The driving force behind this phenomena is the black hole. In this way a black hole is responsible for the creation of a galaxy.
A black hole resides at the center of every galaxy and in the way I have just described actually creates the galaxy, by creating the relative vacuum necessary to draw matter into itself, causing it to be compacted into a smaller and smaller area. It is this black hole, which creates enough force, by the law of orbits to do this. A quiet state is created within the event horizon where very few collisions, versus orbits, takes place. At the same time, it creates the void necessary outside the event horizon, to concentrate these tiny sub atomic masses of particles into nebula, stars and planets, which make up a visible galaxy.
Particle collisions create everything man calls energy, from the fire burning in a fire place, to atomic reactions. When compounds are bombarded by enough of these very small undetectable sub atomic particles, to create self sustaining collisions, of larger and larger sub atomic particles, within the electron clouds, surrounding nuclei of individual atoms, we have a chemical reaction. Peaceful orbital bounds between electron clouds are broken, and the chemical compound breaks up into more elemental compounds and elements, as the reaction continues. The reaction becomes self sustaining, fueled by the collisions created during the breakup of peaceful orbital states. In a chemical reaction, nuclear bounds between protons and neutrons remain in place. The reason for this is because a nuclear bound has many more orbital states, holding the protons and neutrons together, than does a chemical bound between electrons. However, both states are explained by what I like to call the law of orbits. The reason for the much stronger bounding, between neutrons and protons, is because of the much greater mass of protons and neutrons, than that contained in the mass of electrons. A nuclear reaction requires much greater collision force to be exerted on the nuclei of atoms in order to break up the greater numbers of orbital states, which hold the nucleus together. However, once enough peaceful orbital states are destroyed, turning orbiting particles into missiles, which collide, releasing the force stored in their orbits, a self sustaining nuclear chain reaction occurs. Once it becomes self sustaining, there are many more orbital states to be turned in to collisions, which release the much greater force observed in a nuclear reaction, compared to that in a chemical reaction.
The law of orbits basically explains two major characteristics of matter. The first characteristic it explains is the tendency of matter to congeal into larger and larger masses in space. The second characteristic it explains is the tendency of matter to enter into self sustaining chemical or nuclear reactions when enough external force is applied.
I believe my theory of the law of orbits gives a unifying explanation for the phenomena man calls gravity, electromagnetism and nuclear force. This is a universal law that many scientists have spent their lives trying to discover. I believe the Holy Spirit quickened this information to my mind. I am a layman and have nothing to gain whatsoever by publishing this information on the web. As a matter of fact, I welcome input from anyone, who is able to prove these ideas to be false. (I believe that knowing beyond a reasonable doubt, that a thing is false, is second only, in importance, to knowing the truth.)
I believe the material heaven, in which we live, and are able to examine, is finite, and does have a beginning and an end. (Hbr1:10-12) However, I also believe that the natural works of an all powerful, omnipresent and all knowing God, who created us in his image, are not limited, by what man can detect. It reaches into infinity. It is beyond man's ability to totally observe and therefore define infinity. In trying to do so, man is trying to understand everything, by using only the resources of his finite mind, and yet an understanding of everything is well beyond the grasp of a finite mind. Limits were placed on man, when he was created by God, and his rejection of God perverts his ability to understand even those basic concepts, which are within his limits of understanding. It is this intrinsically evil characteristic, rooted in the self centered nature of mankind, that obscures even those clearly understandable principles, which explain the natural attributes of the universe. For example, it seems foolish to say, that something doesn’t exist, or that it changes, to something totally different, just because it cannot be detected.
I believe, although I have no way of proving it scientifically, that it is much easier to understand how the material universe reacts to God's creative word, once we submit to, and place our trust in his Son Jesus. I realize this statement is foolishness to the natural mind. The Bible even says it is foolishness. (1 Cr. 2:14). However, I do not believe we can ever hope to understand the more profound truths, which frame our natural universe, by the use of only our finite minds.
If anyone reading this can give me a logical reason why this view, of how things work, could not be true, please give me your reasoning. Keep it brief. I will be glad to listen to your argument. I would also very much appreciate the help of mathematicians out there, who would like to tackle the proof for this radically different theory of how everything works.
I have not touched on how these ideas will revolutionize our conception of time, but they will.
Here is a short definition of gravity.
Footnote: When Paul said the following in Romans 1:20 -21, he was talking about natural, not spiritual attributes, because spiritual attributes of God cannot be clearly understood by the natural mind of man (John3:8, Cr.2:11), without the leading of the Holy Spirit. He was definitely talking about the invisible characteristics of the material universe, being easily understood by anyone.
God’s eternal power put everything in motion at the instant of creation. This statement must be accepted by faith. It cannot, nor will it ever be proven by science. His Godhead controls and directs that motion. Easily observed orbital states, of stars around black holes, planets around stars, moons around planets and electrons around the nucleus of an atom, continuing on into the very small invisible sub atomic orbital states, store that motion. In this way, the invisible sub atomic orbital states can be clearly understood because their attributes are consistent with that which can be observed.
For since the creation of the world His invisible [attributes] are
clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even]
His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
Written by Wayne Wade
9-8-11
|